It’s nice that both the NHL and IIHF rulebooks make goaltender interference the same number, Rule 69. While that does take some hard-fought goals away from teams, it minimizes the chaos and confusion surrounding the decisions made. This means that any review made will follow that standard, and there are far fewer deviations from the written rule. The IIHF rulebook goes far beyond the NHL’s by providing a table (Appendix 4, Table 16, Rule 69) in the annexes that describe every situation, and if the goal is allowed, disallowed, penalized, non-penalized, where the faceoff is placed, and more. Such as the subjectiveness in the call by the international officials is minimized. That standard seems very similar to the NHL’s however, there are some distinct differences. The IIHF goaltender interference rule essentially boils down to “touching the goalie in the crease is goalie interference”. It is time for the NHL to take a page out of the IIHF rulebook and take out the massive loopholes allowing for subjective calls to remain the norm. While controversy will always surround goalie interference calls due to the nature that they will impact a goal being scored or not, there are examples available of a standard that is very clear in its application. So how is it that one goal where a player had obvious contact in the blue paint resulting in a goaltender’s inability to move freely in his crease is allowed, while another, where the attacking player had left the crease after the contact in the blue paint before the shot being attempted was disallowed? If contact in the blue paint isn’t allowed, shouldn’t that be universally applied, especially when the NHL uses the most up-to-date video technology with a staff of dozens to review these plays and a rule book that states a ruling in clear language? The IIHF Leads the Way Even with the added technology and staff in Toronto able to pour over a play from dozens of angles, it has still been difficult for the league to standardize the judgments on goaltender interference especially when the decisions are made by a different person every game. The rule now has evolved into the current Rule 69, Goaltender Interference. While the onus on the skater to avoid contact with the goalie remained, there were no mitigating circumstances added, such as the defender causing the attacking player to be unable to avoid contact. It was anything by an attacking player casing a goalie to be stopped, forced to change their path, or even slowed down in the crease that was an automatic call.Īs technology improved, the rule evolved. A penalty was assessed if an attacking skater made contact with a goalie in his crease when the goalie was attempting to get in position to attempt a save. When the rule was introduced, things were simple. It's a goal #gohabsgo /vlFCw6BTwq- Blain Potvin □ January 20, 2023 Replays confirmed that the call was questionable, since Merrill appeared to embellish his fall.Tails. The incident occurred with 15:04 remaining in the second period when Predators forward Viktor Arvidsson was called for tripping Red Wings defenseman Jon Merrill in the offensive zone. "There is no justification for his comments, no matter the context or his intention, and the National Hockey League will take any and all steps necessary to protect the integrity our game."Īccording to Sportsnet's Elliotte Friedman, Peel was scheduled to retire later this season and his final game was slated to be on April 24. "Tim Peel's conduct is in direct contradiction to the adherence to that cornerstone principle that we demand of our officials and that our fans, players, coaches and all those associated with our game expect and deserve. "Nothing is more important than ensuring the integrity of our game," NHL Senior Executive Vice President of Hockey Operations Campbell said in a statement. The NHL has announced that referee Tim Peel will no longer be officiating games "now or in the future" due to an incident during Tuesday's game between the Detroit Red Wings and Nashville Predators where he was caught saying he "wanted to get" a penalty against the Predators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |